Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 4040 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
QA
YM YI YE

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07THEHAGUE295, BALKENENDE BLOG: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07THEHAGUE295.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07THEHAGUE295 2007-02-16 12:12 2011-01-18 20:08 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy The Hague
VZCZCXYZ0003
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTC #0295 0471206
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 161206Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8217
INFO RUEHUP/AMEMBASSY BUDAPEST 0179
C O N F I D E N T I A L THE HAGUE 000295 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/16/2017 

TAGS: PINR HU NL

SUBJECT: BALKENENDE BLOG:  REQUEST FOR INFORMATION 
 
REF: STATE 6376 
 
Classified By: COUNSELOR FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS ANDREW J. SCHOF...


97040,2/16/2007 12:06,07THEHAGUE295,"Embassy The Hague",CONFIDENTIAL,07STATE6376,"VZCZCXYZ0003
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTC #0295 0471206
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 161206Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8217
INFO RUEHUP/AMEMBASSY BUDAPEST 0179
","C O N F I D E N T I A L THE HAGUE 000295 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/16/2017 
TAGS: PINR HU NL
SUBJECT: BALKENENDE BLOG:  REQUEST FOR INFORMATION 
 
REF: STATE 6376 
 
Classified By: COUNSELOR FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS ANDREW J. SCHOFER. REASO 
N: 1.4(C). 
 
1. (C) This message is a response to reftel request for 
information on Dutch Prime Minister Balkenende's Weblog by 
Washington Analysts and the Open Source Center (OSC). 
 
2. (C) Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende maintained a 
weblog (blog) -- www.janpeterbalkenende.nl -- during the 
recent Dutch Parliamentary election campaign.  The first 
entry is dated October 2, 2006, and the last is dated 
November 23, 2006, i.e. the day after the elections.  There 
have been no subsequent entries, and post is not aware of any 
plans to revive the blog at this time. 
 
3. (C) Balkenende was one of several party leaders who set up 
blogs during the election in an effort to reach out to new 
potential voters, especially among youth.  Some senior Dutch 
government officials, including outgoing Finance Minister 
Zalm and outgoing Defense Minister Kamp, and about a dozen 
members of Parliament, also maintain regular weblogs between 
elections and use them to comment on current affairs. 
Balkenende has not done so. however. 
 
4. (C) Most of the entries in Balkenende's blog were short, 
peppy, and focused on familiar CDA campaign themes.  While 
post does not know for certain who drafted the entries, the 
language and subject matter was consistent with Balkenende's 
personal style, and we have no reason to believe that he did 
not write them himself.  Reactions were posted on the blog 
and appear to have been only minimally filtered, if at all. 
Most reactions were positive and many offered ""advice"" on 
campaign strategy and how Balkenende should approach 
coalition formation talks. 
 
5. (C) Balkenende's entries made little mention of his home 
life, which is not unusual for politicians in the 
Netherlands.  His relative openness in writing about his own 
experiences on the campaign trail, however, were seen as 
""humanizing"" him and probably added to his popularity.  Dutch 
media reported early in the campaign on the establishment of 
Balkenende's blog -- along with those of his political rivals 
-- but the blog itself does not appear to have been a major 
source of reportable material during the campaign. 
BLAKEMAN